On Monday 18 May 2015, Ivan Čukić wrote: > While I'm usually more conservative, I do think that something more > decisive should be done in this case (and cases like these). While we > do not want to break everything with each new release (wink wink ghm > ghm nudge nudge), I don't think we want to support every > not-still-preferred-approach-of-implementing-something we made before > indefinitely.
a very crude approach may be maintaining a white list of name+version of the applets that needs this, just to make old workspace work for a while and eventually removing it > If there are important 3rd-party plasma 5 applets (are there?) that we > really need to keep back-compatibility for, I'd propose this: we should goover kdelook i gues, there should be 5-6 plasmoids there -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel