On 06/17/2015 05:30 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Am 2015-06-16 16:58, schrieb David Kahles:
Hello,
I want to hear some opinions about the multiscreen behavior of the
lockscreen.
Currently the lockscreen is displayed on all connected monitors. I
would prefer if the
lockscreen is displayed only on the primary monitor, as it's done at
the loginscreen,
because there is no need for multiple instances.
I think this also matches the behavior of other operating
systems/desktop environments.
What do you think?
When we redid the lockscreen to be in QML with the lock always shown
we did it that way on purpose. The main problem is that we don't know
which screen the user is expecting it to be on. Even more we don't
know whether the primary screen is actually the user's primary screen.
We cannot expect users to configure it as they use it.
Easy example: notebook, external screen connected, internal screen is
obviously the primary screen as it's a notebook. Now user closes the
lid, screen stays configured to be on and locks the screen: at that
point user has a broken system because lock screen is not shown any
more. User might even try to hard turn off the system at that point,
because user doesn't even think of the idea the closed notebook screen
could have the locker.
So overall: if we want to be sure that users always can lock in again,
we need to show on all screens.
That makes sense, it could save much trouble.
Out of curiosity: why should the monitor in the closed lid be configured
to stay on? The only reason that
comes to my mind is, when the lid-closed sensor is broken.
David
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
