On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Aleix Pol wrote: >> If the branching is today, we're probably too late already. On the >> other hand waiting for the stable branches will mean that some >> projects will disappear at some point on the stable releases (or we'll >> have to wait until right before Plasma 5.5). >> >> If you think it's worth it, I can work on it today. > > I'm a bit confused by this. Branching is tomorrow, I think my > preferred way would be to include muon all together in Plasma 5.4 and > you can do the splitting after branching tomorrow. If you prefer not > to have Muon Package Manager released with 5.4 would can do the repo > splitting today si estas rapido.
Splitting after branching is going to cause confusion and cause a mess like we had with baloo when it was in kdelibs and at the same time in workspace. This causes unnecessary headache for everyone involved. In particular translators I suppose. So, splitting needs to happen between the last stable release of a plasma and the first pre-release of the next plasma. i.e. right now, or wait until before 5.5. Whether or not splitting now is a good idea depends on how well it is prepared. Ideally of course we'd want nothing to break ;) We can still branch and release muon packagemanager after the split. although TBH I'd not even release it as part of the plasma release bundle but just have it have a standalone release 5.4.0 and then get moved to unmaintained on projects.kde.org. There is nothing to be gained from promoting it as part of Plasma longer than absolutely necessary. HS _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel