On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Hannah von Reth <vonr...@kde.org> wrote: >> Depending on whether we the themes configurable on Windows we could use >> deskopthemes and icons. >> >> Baloo could be useful. If Baloo requires such a UI to be used elsewhere, I'd say it should be provided by Baloo.
>> Emoticons? Same. >> Maybe Style? I doubt it, making just some Qt applications configurable on Windows is random. >> Phonon, Knotifications. >> In some setups Translations might be useful. >> Maybe some more. > > or could have plasma-desktop a build very very limited on windows? > like everything disabled from cmake except the few kcms? I'd say that we must require frameworks to be thorough in their multiplatform perspective and it's configurability. If an application needs a KCM to work properly, it should be provided by the framework, or otherwise the framework is crippled outside of Plasma. Aleix _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
