René J.V. Bertin ha scritto: > On Thursday February 2 2017 21:50:38 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >> You missed the point. This "bit rot" is not about disk damage but >> about software incompatibility. ZFS doesn't help with that... > > You mean diffs that no longer apply cleanly? In that case you missed our > point. Being able to consult intermediate versions of diffs, abandoned diffs > etc. is not to be able to apply them "as is". If there were no value in the > kind of code those diffs (can) contain we'd not be using git or git wouldn't > be preserving every single bit of history. > > > Oh well. This is just another expression of FOSS's biggest weakness. Every > project has this centre-of-the-universe tendency that apparently justifies > breaking things for large parts of the user base whenever the project feels > it's justified.
No one is breaking anything. We are working to try to collect the problems and have them solved, and if you look around in the discussion it seems that a simple mirroring is working. Also, someone else was checking on IRC how the Reviewboard API works. Please let's focus on the way to solve problems. -- Luigi
