jgrulich added a comment.

  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230#192516, @Kanedias wrote:
  
  > @romangg , let's go with following approach: I'll upstream all changes I 
have left hanging (e.g. https://phabricator.kde.org/D9708) by the end of this 
week and will try to come up with some PoC work with PipeWire solution 
this/next weekend.
  >  After it is working we'll have an implicit confirmation that these patches 
indeed have not regressed and can be merged.
  >  And after they're merged I'll continue the work on PipeWire integration 
and discuss it in detail.
  >
  > How does it sound?
  
  
  Hi,
  
  I see you have made some progress here, I had similar intentions to bring 
support for PipeWire to KWin as it's something we develop in Red Hat and trying 
to push it forward, but I'm still a newbie in this area and trying to 
understand the stuff around still. Anyway, I just wanted to tell you that I 
have an opportunity to talk to Wim Taymans (author of PipeWire) and attend a 
small PipeWire hackfest we will have in Brno's Red Hat office in two weeks so 
if there is anything I can help with, what should I discuss, suggest, whatever, 
just let me know, I would really like to help here.
  
  Jan

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230

To: Kanedias, graesslin, davidedmundson, romangg, #kwin
Cc: jgrulich, romangg, ngraham, alexeymin, aacid, kwin, #kwin, davidedmundson, 
plasma-devel, iodelay, bwowk, leezu, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, 
ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, eliasp, sebas, apol, mart, hein

Reply via email to