jgrulich added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230#192516, @Kanedias wrote: > @romangg , let's go with following approach: I'll upstream all changes I have left hanging (e.g. https://phabricator.kde.org/D9708) by the end of this week and will try to come up with some PoC work with PipeWire solution this/next weekend. > After it is working we'll have an implicit confirmation that these patches indeed have not regressed and can be merged. > And after they're merged I'll continue the work on PipeWire integration and discuss it in detail. > > How does it sound? Hi, I see you have made some progress here, I had similar intentions to bring support for PipeWire to KWin as it's something we develop in Red Hat and trying to push it forward, but I'm still a newbie in this area and trying to understand the stuff around still. Anyway, I just wanted to tell you that I have an opportunity to talk to Wim Taymans (author of PipeWire) and attend a small PipeWire hackfest we will have in Brno's Red Hat office in two weeks so if there is anything I can help with, what should I discuss, suggest, whatever, just let me know, I would really like to help here. Jan REPOSITORY R108 KWin REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230 To: Kanedias, graesslin, davidedmundson, romangg, #kwin Cc: jgrulich, romangg, ngraham, alexeymin, aacid, kwin, #kwin, davidedmundson, plasma-devel, iodelay, bwowk, leezu, ZrenBot, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, eliasp, sebas, apol, mart, hein