kossebau added a comment.
In D1230#230642 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230#230642>, @romangg wrote: > In D1230#230613 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230#230613>, @Kanedias wrote: > > > They don't override anything and compile fails for me if they are present. GCC 7.3.1. > > > I believe this is an unrelated regression you just ran into because of D11209 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D11209>. I hadn't yet updated my KDecoration clone, that's why it still compiled for me. In any case please remove the unrelated override keyword removal from the patch and let's hope the regression will be quickly fixed in KDecoration. No, D11209 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D11209> should be innocent here. Not exporting the symbols of the pimpl classes has no effect on the virtualness of the methods of the normal classes. The issue is rather that those tooltip-related methods only got added recently to master, see D7246 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D7246>. So KWin master also expects KDecoration master. REPOSITORY R108 KWin REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D1230 To: Kanedias, graesslin, davidedmundson, romangg, #kwin Cc: kossebau, jgrulich, romangg, ngraham, alexeymin, aacid, kwin, #kwin, davidedmundson, plasma-devel, schernikov, iodelay, zzag, bwowk, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, eliasp, sebas, apol, mart, hein
