Hi Jonah, I tend to update the versions on behalf of the new contributor. Once a person starts to contribute more, I try to explain the version rules.
Best regards, Lars Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> schrieb am Sa., 13. Juni 2020, 16:21: > Hello Platform devs, > > I want to solicit some input and experience from you to apply to CDT. > > CDT roughly follows the Eclipse Platform versioning rules. This leads > to contributors who only occasionally contribute having more difficult time > than I think they should have. This increases the perception that > contributing to CDT is hard. (e.g. trivial fixes that pass all tests, still > fails build) > > How does the platform team deal with this? Do you require new contributors > to learn all the rules such as incrementing service segments and require > the contributor to fix it? Or does an experienced committer simply make a > comment to educate and then the committer completes the housekeeping fix > themselves? > > Up until now I have generally taken the approach of requiring the > contributor to do this housekeeping, but it feels unwelcoming. > > Thank you for any input on how you have handled this in the past, or if > you have any official policy on this. > > Jonah > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > _______________________________________________ > platform-dev mailing list > platform-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev >
_______________________________________________ platform-dev mailing list platform-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev
