Yes, that is an advantage. The disadvantage is that we start with a
neglected packed-with-rubbish website we have to clean out instead of
starting fresh and cherry-picking the good stuff.
I don't think that it is really critical for a website. If people really
want to be able to go through the history then we can archive the old site.
*Website genesis:*
commit c5ae5f6bae863ec80a6d563a30d834279d48059c
Author: jeff <jeff>
Date: Fri Nov 2 13:46:54 2001 +0000
initial
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:11 AM Mickael Istria <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:56 PM Wim Jongman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> That would mean pulling in all the ancient pages. I'm not sure this is
>> the best solution. Let's think about this a bit.
>>
>
> That would also mean keeping history of the Website, which *might* be
> useful; especially if we delete too much content later by mistake as part
> of the migration to markdown/hugo: reverting is still easy when history is
> still there, more difficult without a history.
> --
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
> developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev
>
_______________________________________________
platform-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev
