On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Michał Kępień <ker...@kempniu.pl> wrote: >> > If you feel like I'm nit-picking and none of the above matters, >> > please feel free to disregard my input and just follow your gut. >> >> It's ok. We just understand it quite differently. And in this case what >> about changing commit message to something like this? >> >> === >> dell-wmi: Check if Dell WMI descriptor structure is valid >> >> After examining existing DSDT ACPI tables of more laptops and looking >> into Dell WMI document mentioned in ML dicussion archived at >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg07220.html we will >> parse and check WMI descriptor if contains expected data. It is because >> WMI descriptor contains interface version number and it is needed to >> know in next commit. >> === > > I like it way more than the previous one. >
FWIW, the original version of this series works fine on my laptop (after fixing the separate dmi_walk misuse bug). --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
