Great, thanks. It'll be nice to have this.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote: > Do note that the 'opam-doc' package in OPAM does work at the moment. > > It's just not integrated into the compiler, but it does do enough to > compile up the Core docs at Jane Street or the mirage.github.io docs. > We're unlikely to do any bugfixes to that though, as the effort is > going into the new version that Leo describes below. > > -anil > > On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:05, Leo White <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Ashish, > > > > I will be rewriting the opam-doc tool over the summer as part of work > > towards the OCaml platform. Should hopefully have something usable by > > September. > > > > The `bin-doc` parts of the tool (which previously parsed documentation > > comments and stored them in ".cmd" files) have already been rewritten as > > a compiler patch to parse comments and store them in ".cmt" files as > > special attributes (on github as pr #51). Unfortunately this patch did > > not get into 4.02 as there were some concern over parts of it. I hope to > > address these concerns over the summer as well. > > > > Regards, > > > > Leo > > > > Ashish Agarwal <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> Does anyone know the status of opam-doc. Are we closer to having nice > documentation easily generated for all of our > >> installed libraries? > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Platform mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/platform > > _______________________________________________ > > Infrastructure mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure > > > >
_______________________________________________ Platform mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/platform
