John Sullivan wrote: > Sure, I agree with that, but to me it's a little more like antiword, > which converts a proprietary format to a free one. It's a temporary > conversion measure.
I'm not complaining that they're providing a way to convert (say) wmv->ogg. I'm complaining they're telling people to convert wmv->flv->ogg, using YouTube. Cut out the middle man. >> I also don't see why they are using Facebook instead of a free framework >> like OpenID. > > They are using OpenID now, at least. Yes, it's obviously a new feature, still poorly documented (see "Videos can be associated with your FaceBook account if you are logged in.") on the main page. Matt Flaschen
