On Sat 9. of July 2005 18:26, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 23:02 +0200, Tomasz Wittner wrote: > > I can't imagine such situation (but I'm not brilliant ;) - version is taken > > from date '+%Y.%m.%d' . > > I have one (off-topic) question: why invent your own private date format > when there's ISO 8601? Interesting (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html). IMO 2005.07.08 is more readable than 20050708. I didn't know about this standard before. You can assume that 2005.07.08 is only version number no date ;)
-- Tomasz Wittner _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en