On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 00:25 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > There were some small changes in macros, so no need to fake. Will > > bumping rpm_macros_rev in rpm.spec and changing BR: rpm-build to > > BR: rpmbuild(macros) be sufficient? How does that work with backporting > > to AC-branch? > yes. true. it won't work until it's really backported. (ie the BR could be > satisfied but the actual behaviour not) > > so perhaps rpmbuild(monoautodeps) is the right choice.
No need to introduce a Provides for every single new feature. rpm_macros_rev high enough has always served that purpose. If you're concerned that someone will bump macros rev on Ac again without backporting the mono changes, mark that as a TODO in AC-branch spec. Then again, if you're modifying it, you might port the change altogether as well. -- Paweł Sakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux Distribution _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en