> > I think it's not necessary (only insightful) and could be done in > > parallel with the implementation. > > PLD is about choice, isn't it? (and probably there are people who would > > like to use etcnet because e.g. they are already used to it, so why not?) > > If etcnet can coexist with current implementation, I agree with you. > I thought etcnet was to replace PLD's solution.
I'd certainly like to try etcnet -- I read a bit about it a while ago, and it looked interesting! Here's to choice! Ari _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
