Hi, wrobell (Friday 09 of September 2005 10:42): > which is de facto the branch name... so, what's the problem? lenght?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cd rpm/SPECS/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ up koffice.spec P koffice.spec [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ vi koffice.spec [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ up -r DEVEL koffice.spec P koffice.spec [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ vi koffice.spec [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS $ I needed to check some parts of the spec in different branches, i do that very often, now try do this with a not greater number of words in commands with svn. Not to mention that after a probable reorganisation doingh such stuff would mean rechecking folders (per package folders), which sucks, because some package could be sharing sources but have different setups on branches or in specs, but the tarballs would remain the same, that would be another disadvantage. -- Piotr Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
