On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 02:59 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > I don't get it. Why is: > > cvs ci SPECS/foo.spec SOURCES/foo.patch > > worse than the same in svn?
Because it won't work with cvs unless you add -d$(cat SPECS/CVS/Root) :P BTW, that's another reason for directory-per-package. With SPECS/SOURCES there's no straightforward way to make sure that you're committing everything you've changed. Consistent (+-) file naming lets you use the result of `cd SOURCES;cvs up foo*` as a clue, but 1) it will give some false positives (e.g. glibc* for glib) and some false negatives (eg. sysvinit-paths.patch for SysVinit) and 2) you won't see deleted files. OTOH in a package's directory a simple `svn status` guarantees that "oops, forgot to commit this other patch" won't happen. -- Paweł Sakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux Distribution _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
