Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 November 2005 11:49, havner wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:42:50PM +0100, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > > aspell 0.60 to Ac? > > > > what is the reason for 0.50 right now? > > > > > > We had some problems with aspell 0.60. > > > > aspell 0.60 was in AC some time ago, we decided to downgrade cause there > > was not many new features and it was significantly slower. > there is now, aspell 0.60 has more dictionaries than 0.50
AFAIR it was not problem with aspell itself, but with its cooperation with some applicetion (maybe somebody remind me which one): aspell 0.60 became 100% CPU consuming for unknown reason. No such problem with aspell 0.50 were known. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
