Dnia 17-05-2006, śro o godzinie 00:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a): > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): > > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: > > > > > BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. > > > > > > > > Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? > > > > > > mozilla.spec > > > mozilla-firefox.spec > > > mozilla-thunderbird.spec > > > > > so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho > > > > I think we should rename mozilla-firefox to firefox and the same for > > thunderbird. > > Sources are called just firefox and thunderbird, but full application > names are "Mozilla Firefox" and "Mozilla Thunderbird". > And the latter is a companion to the first, so it's rational to keep > them grouped.
Agreed but I still prefer Evolution to Thunderbird ;) BTW: other distros use firefox and thunderbird as package names. > > We don't call libnotify galago-project-libnotify nor do we > > name other packages in a similar way. So seamonkey and xulrunner should > > be named by their project names, not their vendors (especially when > > seamonkey is not officially supported). > And the last remark was the reason I committed seamonkey.spec, not > mozilla-seamonkey.spec. Ok then. -- Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en