On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:05:34PM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:51:23PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > > > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:03:32PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > > > > http://hedera.linuxnews.pl/_news/2006/05/16/_long/3852.html > > > > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something > > > > > > Great. > > > > > > Maybe we could rebuild openoffice 1.x with java support, prepare > > > eclipse and push those to Ac. > > > > openoffice 1.x? You must be joking. OOO 2 is the only version acceptable > > for AC. > > I tried to build ot amd64, but it fails (g++ falls in an endless loop), > and from what I googled, it seems like it is a bug in gcc 3.3.x. And I > haven't tried other archs. > > Since we won't switch to gcc 3.4.x, we'll have to use ooo 1.1.x
Which isn't available for x86_64 too, so it doesn't matter. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en