Anyone against such patch?
IMO users should have rw access to CD devices, not only for writing.
F.e. cdaudio or eject requires them as well. Maybe group name is not the
best now, but it doesn't matter that much.
Index: udev.rules
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/SOURCES/udev.rules,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.37 udev.rules
--- udev.rules 10 May 2006 18:38:30 -0000 1.37
+++ udev.rules 4 Jul 2006 12:21:16 -0000
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@
BUS=="scsi", KERNEL=="sr[0-9]*", ACTION=="add", IMPORT="cdrom_id
--export $tempnode"
BUS=="scsi", KERNEL=="scd[a-z]", ACTION=="add", IMPORT="cdrom_id
--export $tempnode"
-ENV{ID_CDROM}=="?*", SYMLINK+="cdrom", GROUP="disk"
+ENV{ID_CDROM}=="?*", SYMLINK+="cdrom", GROUP="cdwrite"
ENV{ID_CDROM_CD_RW}=="?*", SYMLINK+="cdrw", GROUP="cdwrite"
-ENV{ID_CDROM_DVD}=="?*", SYMLINK+="dvd", GROUP="disk"
+ENV{ID_CDROM_DVD}=="?*", SYMLINK+="dvd", GROUP="cdwrite"
ENV{ID_CDROM_DVD_R}=="?*", SYMLINK+="dvdrw", GROUP="cdwrite"
LABEL="ide_end"
--
Regards Havner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developer http://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
