ping Would sb bacport a fix or are we switching Ac to use autoconf 2.60 and making libtasn1 soname change?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:20:27PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:08:38PM +0200, qboosh wrote: > > Author: qboosh Date: Mon Sep 25 19:08:38 2006 GMT > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - updated to 1.4.4 (fixes CVE-2006-4790) > > Should we upgrade gnutls in Ac[1] or backport fix[2]? > > [1] it would require autoconf 2.60 (because of new gnulib) and libtasn1 > soname change > > [2] from here: > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001212.html > or from another distro -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
