On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:29:51AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:37, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > Well, there is only bash left as a option for /bin/sh it seems ;-) > > > > Interesting test suite: > > http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/blog.html/nb_20050320_1408.html > > But it tests only IFS compliance. > What about all other functionality?
Haven't seen tests for other functionality. > bash is not 100% POSIX compliant, although (at least) some of issues are > commonly accepted (e.g. no escape expansion in echo without -e switch). It seems that there is no single POSIX compilant shell. I wonder which is closest to posix compilance? -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
