On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:12, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > > > Of course there are still problems. > > > > > > libdb.la symlink to real file libdb-4.5.la > > > > > > Now other packages get R: libtool(libdb.la) but nothing provides it since > > > it's not detected. > > > > > > Wouldn't be it better to generate Requires: /usr/lib/file.la instead of > > > libtool(/usr/lib/file.la) ? That way we wouldn't need to rebuild all > > > packages containing .la files. > > > > Or simply: > > > > --- libtooldeps.sh.orig 2006-11-26 00:16:19 +0100 > > +++ libtooldeps.sh 2006-11-26 22:06:56 +0100 > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > > do > > case "$dep" in > > /*.la) > > + $dep = `readlink -f $dep` > > echo "libtool($dep)" > > ;; > > esac > > > > That won't work.
Will. Ie. some package R: libtool(/usr/lib/libdb.la), with this patch will be converted to R: libtool(/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la), which is provided by db4.5-devel > The dep against libdb.la is correct one. The problem is with > provides not requires. > > > Tomek > _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en