On Fri, 02 Feb 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > These I want removed / Te do wywałki: > > pam_make - use pam_exec from Linux-PAM / zastępuje go pam_exec z > > Linux-PAM > > pam_cap - ever used? / ktoś tego używa? > > pam_netid - ever used? / ktoś tego używa? > > pam_opie - ever used? / ktoś tego używa? > > pam_skey - ever used? / ktoś tego używa? > > pam_tcpd - ever used? / ktoś tego używa? > > pam_usertty - ever used? / ktoś tego używa? > > pam_utmp - I don't think I even tested it after coding > > / nie przypominam sobie żebym to wogóle > > przetestował > > Never really used :-) I was playing with skey or opie once...
Skey is not a problem as it exists on its own, the rest is painful as they can be found only as single .c files or not at all. > > These are with uncertain future / niepewna przyszłość: > > pam_console - either we are maintaining out own version or we're > > taking the oroginal from RH/FC > > / albo pilnujemy własnej twórczości albo bierzemy > > wersje z RH/FC z dobrodziejstwem inwentarza > > What's disadvantage of using upstream version comparing to our own? Ours is the cut-down version of original RH one. We may as well take pam_console pam_rps pam_tally2 and pam_timestamp from FC. > > pam_homedir - I'm inclined to patch pam_mkhomedir and symlink > > pam_homedir > > to it > > / skłaniam się do połatania pam_mkhomedir i > > podlinkowania pam_homedir do niego > > Never used. I use it, if no one else then I'll just do it. Janek -- Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
