On 5/16/07, Cezary Krzyzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dnia 16-05-2007, śro o godzinie 08:45 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz > napisał(a): > > DON'T use ,,th is development'' as excuse for such things please. > Yea, maybe You're right. Nevertheless I couldn't have tested it in the > first place, that's why I've asked the RFC.
"TH is not development! That's SPARTAAAAAA!" > http://svn.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewsvn/geninitrd/trunk/geninitrd?r1=8409&r2=8560&p1=geninitrd/trunk/geninitrd&p2=geninitrd/trunk/geninitrd Looks nice. > I hope it helps. As for the devices paths way > (like /dev/something/even_futher) I can't imagine all the variations of > the path to actually make it work, but I'll think bout it. Too bad there is no HAL at boot time ;) -- Patryk Zawadzki Generated Content _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
