On 8/7/07, Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:48:09PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > So, is there anything against using feature-provides and conflicts > > (only for really conflicting packages)? > > > > Old packages should not be a problem if we rebuild all affected software. > > It is a problem as just rebuilding them don't force installing them on all > existing machines. In such cases I propose changing package name Obsoletes > to Conflicts: package-name < (E:V-R before Provides has been added). > > Also, you found a set of packages which are really mutually exclusive > and installing more than one makes no sense: issue*. Just dropping > Obsoletes makes an unresolved conflict in distribution (try poldek > --verify=fileconflicts). I think P+O: issue-package (literally, virtual > package with that name) is the way to go (keeping in mind previous > paragraph).
Added versioned Conflicts where possible. Can't add C: issue < 2.99-2 as they were and are all providing "issue." I could drop the provide but I'm not sure if anything requires or required that in Ac/Th. -- Patryk Zawadzki Generated Content _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en