On Thursday 07 August 2008 00:35, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:24:37PM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:59:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > how many out there use custom kernel anyway (i mean by that kernel > > > installed without rpm package)? > > > > What kind of bullshit argument is it supposed to be? > > The "both solutions sucks, let's choose lesser evil" one, I guess.
what we want? integrity or what? if you want to use custom kernel.config, then kernel.spec on LINUX_2_6 offers that. you can't control things that are outside package management. and trying to do it half-way you break packages that are not originated from main line distros (th doesn't have kernel-desktop on ftp, but it provides upgrade for nvidia userspace). while accounting for the non-rpm based kernels, %{with dist_kernel} having the versioned dependency (while it really doesn't matter if it's strict NVR based one), it doesn't "break" so much, while providing a little consistency that the poldek --upgrade-dist doesn't leave with kernel/userspace abi mismatch. oh and it's so cool that with last poldek --upgrade-dist on th-system, it broke my networkmanager and x11, i can't use my laptop anymore... and i have to fight here to get some integrity in package upgrades, when figured out what broke the system, so cool, so fun! -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en