On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:06:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On Friday 03 October 2008 22:24:19 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:04:52PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > > i understand that we need to rename packages that have moved to > > > http://commons.apache.org > > > > > > how do we call them? > > > > > > - apache-commons-io (*) > > > - commons-io > > > - java-commons-io > > > - java-apache-commons-io > > > > > > (*) i prefer this one, unless it rises some additional confusion or > > > restruction due name use... > > > > I prefer the third ("java-commons-io") and I would be happy to see > > similar change for all java libraries. This way they would be grouped > > like python or perl modules. And there would be no confusion because > > of the http server in 'apache' package or because library names looking > > like application names. > > sounds sane, > but this ("java-" prefix) would apply only to libraries not applications? > > i mean tomcat, jAlbum won't be named as java-apache-tomcat, java-jAlbum, > java-gallery-remote.. ?
only libs like in case of python, i.e. python-psycopg2 (lib) but gaphor (an app). wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en