On Tuesday 02 February 2010 16:04:46 shadzik wrote:
> Author: shadzik Date: Tue Feb 2 14:04:46 2010 GMT
> Module: packages Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - make it build on Titanium, try not to break build on Th - let's see if
> that succeeded
...
> +%if "%{pld_release}" != "ti"
> %attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.6
> %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.*.*
> %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.5
> %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.*.*
> %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.5
> +%else
> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.5
> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libncursesw.so.5
> +%endif
this has exceeded sane amount of the nesting level of ifdefs, please move the
branch specific spec to a dedicated branch, both branches be nicer and more
easier to update. there isn't so much changes in a spec that such complexity
of following the conditions (to verify nothing got broken after a change)
pays off.
same applies to openssl.spec
--
glen
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
