On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:23:49AM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > Or maybe building *-static _should_ require -static and not only -devel?
Yup. > In short: instead removing I've suggested repackaging into *-static, > just because in contrary to other distros we support this kind of build. In ALT Linux ( :)) ), we do have some *-devel-static packages and they do buildrequire corresponding static subpackages for what they use to build (or more precisely, to statically link against). buildreq is a nice tool: http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=rpm-utils.git;a=blob;f=rpm-utils/buildreq;hb=HEAD -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <m...@altlinux.ru> ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
