On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Mariusz Mazur <mma...@kernel.pl> wrote: >> The admision/removal of a CDG member is accomplished by a 2/3 majority >> vote with a minimum of 50% turnout. Only CDG members vote. > With the current cdg member's list, any vote will result in at least 50% of > members getting automatically booted from cdg. Yes, rules are not perfect.
>> A proposal for removing a member is to be voted on after 3 months of >> that members inactivity as a CDG (lack of comments, no voting, etc.). > Can multible removals/additions be made in a single vote? Why not? >> > For this example, members that does not exists on that statistics are: >> So what? > For a CDG decission to have any legitimacy, the CDG members should reflect the > currently active developers. So it makes sense to base the updated CDG members > list on the top commiters list + infrastructure admins. cdg is cdg. Changing rules and/or member list in a way that breaks the aforementioned rules is in no way legal. Staging a coup d'état breaks the continouity of our "government", for the lack of better word. wolf _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
