On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:34:44PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: > > There is also > > > > http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/jA6s9GD0sh2vKRhR2zat > > > > to study. > > > > We could also think about zipping of the modules later... > > > > Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3.2 > > during the weekend using source files and __pycache__. > > > > Is that OK? > > I guess this is a must, anyway... > > The problem is that will probably require fixing lots of python-*.spec > files which have: > > ...../*.py[co] > > in their files. That will have to be changed to *.py and __pycache__ > added. Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not > packaging) __pycache__ and its contents? So it doesn't have to be listed > explicitly for every python package. I am thinking about something like > %find_lang - e.g. %find_pybytcode, or '%py_listmodules modul1e module2'
Actually it refers only to python3-* packages, not all python-*.spec. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
