On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 17 of June 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > Is it OK to merge 0.9.32 on HEAD?
> > The simple static cases (busybox functions) which were reported to fail
> > with 0.9.31 seem to work now (tested on i686).
>
> This one fails:
>
> [arekm@carme-pld-i686 ~]$ cat a1.c
> int
> main ()
> {
>
> ;
> return 0;
> }
>
> [arekm@carme-pld-i686 ~]$ i686-uclibc-gcc -o conftest -O2
> -fno-strict-aliasing
> -fwrapv -march=i686 -mtune=pentium4 -gdwarf-4 -g2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,--
> as-needed -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,combreloc a1.c
> [arekm@carme-pld-i686 ~]$ ./conftest
> zsh: segmentation fault ./conftest
Uhm :/
More complex programs (like busybox) used to work for me at the time of
testing.
I don't think dwarf-4 is the reason.
Does switching ld to bfd version help?
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
