On Jul 14, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > > Ok, you may be right. But what than? We don't even have an idea how > should the proper rpm solution work and no volunteers to design and code > it. At the same time Python 3.2 is waiting for being included in PLD,
Um, that isn't true: I did just ask for a statement of what is desired with __pycache__ handling for the purpose of attempting to design/code a solution in RPM. 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
