On 05.09.2011 16:14, Artur Frysiak wrote:
2011/9/5 Elan Ruusamäe<g...@pld-linux.org>:
On 01.09.2011 22:17, Artur Frysiak wrote:
2011/9/1 Elan Ruusamäe<g...@delfi.ee>:
On 09/01/2011 12:55 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Don't "+1", someone just do it 8-)
this is a bit more difficult that it may seem at first sight.
if keeping it in util-linux.spec, removing from SysVinit.spec and
upstart-SysVinit.spec, then in which package it exactly go?
To mount package.
any explanation to came?
No :-) Just wild guess.
ok, seems version provided by util-linux depends on libmount:
$ ldd ~/tmp/util-linux-2.20-root-glen/bin/mountpoint
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff72ac0000)
libmount.so.1 => not found
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000033a8800000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000033a8400000)
as opposed to one provided in sysvinit
$ ldd /bin/mountpoint
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffa97ff000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fef451c0000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fef4554f000)
and seems mount pkg is the right place
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/sysvinit-devel/2011-06/msg00010.html
--
glen
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
