On Wednesday 04 of July 2012 18:39:56 Kacper Kornet wrote: > Any bug reports, comments etc. more then welcome.
1). do we really need two notifications for single event? http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/000062.html http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/000063.html 2). "[x/n] naming" for consistency, the short merge description http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/000066.html should be called a "[0/n] merge foo branch" and following "[{1..n}/n]" patches should be sent as a reply to the "0/n" (for easier emails threading). or... the [x/n] marking should be dropped at all. moreover, these notifications duplicate information from 'branch master updated' emails. imho, too much redundant notifications around the merge event. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en