On Sep 23, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Tomasz Pala <go...@polanet.pl> wrote: > > Well, I might be wrong, but I think Lukasz expects something like > rpm -Uvh /var/spool/repackage/[date range reversed]*/* --force --nomd5 > only - i.e. not actual transactions rollback, but package set restore > (in proper order, thus preserving dependencies). >
One might expect whatever outcome one wishes … \ > Restoring filesystem state (including things altered by triggers etc.) > is indeed dm/filesystem/backup software job and there's no point simulating > it on one more level. > … but triggers are executed as part of package management, changing file system state, and are not simply invertible. I do not understand your distinction. How is --rollback to be performed if operations are only partially reversed? 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
