On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:17:20PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 14.02.2013 16:54, Marcin Banasiak wrote: > >2013/2/14 Elan Ruusamäe: > >>how gtkspell 3.x should be packaged? > >I think that we should upgrade gtkspell.spec to 3.x and create > >gtkspell2.spec for 2.x. Sooner or later packages that depend on 2.x > >will be ported to the new API and then we can simply remove gtkspell2. > > > seems upstream tarball name is gtkspell3, library names gtkspell3-3.pc > etc, seems better to clone current to gtkspell3 ... > > so, either way is fine to me, somebody just has to say which way :)
In such case (gtkspell3 everywhere) I'd use gtkspell3.spec. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
