On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > Even if probablity reduction fixes the problem for now, I will apply Jacek's > patch to rpm in PLD (with s/rpmbfFree/rpmfiFree/). Just changing Bloom > filter parameters won't mean that the problem is gone, it will just make it > harder to occur and I want stable installation order, always. >
See my other mail. You may do whatever you wish: the Bloom filter implementation was planned 5y ago, discussed @rpm5.org when implemented ~3y ago, and there were (at least) 2 members from PLD who had a chance to point out flaws in my reasoning, or to suggest a different approach. I also believe that you need to think through the consequences of false positives far more carefully before pledging allegience to PLD members patches. Again, you can/will do whatever you wish, I really do not care. You had timely responses with accurate information to reported problems from me. That is my only "obligation". 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en