On 24/09/13 00:50, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Elan Ruusamäe <g...@pld-linux.org> wrote:

On 23/09/13 22:10, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
$ grep _rpmversion -r /usr/lib/rpm/
/usr/lib/rpm/macros:%_rpmversion                3.0 (Th)

Is it what it's expected to be?
It was 4.5 in rpm-4.5, >= 5 in rpm-5.1.12.
Now "%{_rpmversion}" >= "5.0" check doesn't work as before...
afaik it's bug in rpm 5.4.13, ID= gets overwritten from lsb package. there's 
patch in rpm5-devel list

The existence of a patch does not
imply a "bug".

RPM cannot dictate its own version,
distros and LSB can and do.

RPM can (and does) use other means than versioning to achieve compatibility 
goals all this century.


so why did you apply it, give the same mambo-jumbo in your lists too!
http://rpm5.org/community/rpm-devel/5552.html

ps: any plans to fix cvs commits lists for rpm5 there?
http://rpm5.org/community/rpm-cvs/summary.html ends with Feb 2011


--
glen

_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Reply via email to