On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:03:03 +0100 Jakub Bogusz <qbo...@pld-linux.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:57:47PM +0100, jajcus wrote: > > commit e8450def6f4213398d8738010225971179936cc5 > > Author: Jacek Konieczny <jaj...@jajcus.net> > > Date: Tue Nov 12 17:57:25 2013 +0100 > > > > new package > > > > xorriso.spec | 86 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > We have this packaged as libisofs + libburn + libisoburn
Very intuitive, indeed… How would anybody expect to find it there? And relation between http://libburnia-project.org/ and http://www.gnu.org/software/xorriso/ is not quite obvious. The sources are practically the same, thouh. The libisoburn package License field suggests GPL v2+, but xorriso license is actually GPL v3+ (quite a difference). The new xorriso package builds 'standalone' xorriso and no libraries but if we use the libraries, then I guess the libisofs + libburn + libisoburn packages are the way to go. But we should build xorriso binary and its Tcl/Tk frontend to separate packages. 'lib*' is not a right package for end-user applications. And we can set the License right for the xorriso package. Greets, Jacek _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en