On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I > >> decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. > >> > >> But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are > >> currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver > >> patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which > >> will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community > >> (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT > >> HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! > >> > >> To sum it up: > >> - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream > >> - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver > >> - kernel - mainline, without Vserver > > A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 > > kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt > > out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have > > vserver patch appliad. > > > > so what you suggests to users who have switched to 3.10 knowing it will > be next longterm? i.e preferring the longterm rather bleeding edge kernel.
Really? You reported seemingly unfixable problem with 3.10 (100% CPU) without any solution and then switched to THAT kernel? You are pulling my leg here. > should go back to 3.4? use manual 3.10 builds, or try the HEAD? What works best for them, 3.4 or HEAD. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl baggins<at>pld-linux.org _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en