On 2015-07-27 08:35, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly
instead of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its
own, though probably without x32 support.
how would pld name the package?
a) openjdk.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec
That works well in any intermediate stages and worked well for sun-java*
and icedtea*.
in Fedora it's like this:
[~/fc] ➔ cat java-1.7.0-icedtea/dead.package; echo
java-1.7.0-icedtea was replaced by java-1.6.0-openjdk.
That is clearly different from our current scheme, which works quite
well for us.
Jacek
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
