On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:01:41PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On 2016-01-22 17:59, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > file /usr/bin/bat from install of alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64 > > conflicts with file from package bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64 > > file /usr/share/man/man1/bat.1.gz from install of > > alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > > bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64 > > I have noticed that too. > > The 'bat' from ALSA is a test tool, the one from bacula is an end user > application. Also, we have had Bacula's BAT in PLD longer, so I think > ALSA side should be 'fixed'. > > I can see two options: > - separate ALSA bat into a new package. Still conflicting, but a chance > that someone would need ALSA bat and Bacula bat at the same time are small > - rename the ALSA utility ? it will be a bit more difficult to find it, > when someone expects 'bat', but there would be no conflict any more.
I propose renaming alsa's bat to alsa-bat. The others: Fedora uses alsa-utils-bat subpackage. Debian doesn't have ALSA 1.1.0 yet. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
