You need to revert this:

http://git.pld-linux.org/?p=packages/llvm.git;a=commitdiff;h=f8b4baa198f262d3bff6af0ba38065ad386881a5;hp=fba35f645ed4c3ec1fd41765993175a580cd2c91

I've been testing if newly added builders disk capacity is enough for
this beast ;)
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 4:02 PM Jakub Bogusz <qbo...@pld-linux.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > On 12/12/2018 16.06, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > >
> > > THEY just changed the way of enabling rtti (from make variable to cmake
> > > define).
> > > As we had rtti in previous versions of llvm and it's needed by other
> > > packages (i.e. Mesa/pipe-*), IMO we should just keep it enabled (and
> > > rebuild packages already built with rtti-less llvm 7, if necessary).
> >
> > I can see you have already fixed the spec, but how do we build it now?
> > It seems the builders currently cannot handle it.
>
> I successfully built llvm on carme-x32 (with split-dwarf)...
>
> Maybe we should reduce debuginfo level for this package.
>
>
> --
> Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en



-- 
Jan Rękorajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/
baggins<at>pld-linux.org
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Reply via email to