On Mon, 01 Mar 2021, Jan Palus wrote: > On 01.03.2021 11:59, PLD th-src builder wrote: > > vtk.spec (HEAD): FAILED > > > > --- vtk.spec:HEAD: > > Build-Time: user:1.17s sys:0.84s real:7.29s (faults io:435 non-io:44415) > > > > > > > > *** buildlog for vtk.spec > > request from: atler > > started at: Mon Mar 1 12:59:52 2021 > > building SRPM using: cd rpm/packages; nice -n 0 ./builder -nu -nm --nodeps > > --http --define '_pld_builder 1' -bs -r HEAD vtk.spec 2>&1 > > > > Cloning into 'vtk'... > > Already on 'master' > > Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'. > > Already up to date. > > sh: /usr/bin/tclsh: inaccessible or not found > > error: /home/users/builder/rpm/packages/vtk/vtk.spec: line 399: Macro > > %tcl_version has empty body > > Name (NVR) query failed > > internal error: cache_rpm_dump not called! (missing %prep?) > > internal error: cache_rpm_dump not called! (missing %prep?) > > internal error: cache_rpm_dump not called! (missing %prep?) > > internal error: cache_rpm_dump not called! (missing %prep?) > > internal error: cache_rpm_dump not called! (missing %prep?) > > internal error: cache_rpm_dump not called! (missing %prep?) > > WARNING! Spec name (vtk) does not agree with package name () > > I suppose tcl should be installed on src builder.
That's half of the solution. The other half is to fix the macro to not expand to nothing. I'll take care of both. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | baggins<at>pld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
