On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:38 AM Adam Gołębiowski <ad...@pld-linux.org> wrote: > > > W dniu 2021-05-13 o 21:32, Elan Ruusamäe pisze: > > > point of that guard was to wait for support to become available or > > someone implement a solution. > > (...) > > but as no such solution as provided, you need to update obsoletes to > > fill **all** package names that provide that file path. > > > > I refuse to do that myself as it's pretty stupid. > > ugly, for sure, but unless we come up with another solution (patching > rpm to support Obsoletes: /path), we will need to maintain 11 Obsoletes: > lines per package ... >
What problem are you trying to solve here? I'm not sure I understand why you're doing this. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
