On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 12:34:52PM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 09:56:10AM +0200, wrobell wrote: > > > Author: pluto Date: Fri Jul 2 20:25:43 2004 GMT > > > Module: SPECS Tag: DEVEL > > > ---- Log message: > > > - 3.4.1 released. > > when will it be merged on head? > Probably when, akhem, akhem, RM will start making AC-branches. 3.4.x > cannot be included in AC because it would require rebuilding all stuff > dependant on libstdc++. Why gcc for AC is not on AC branch (as other packages, i.e. rpm)? Answer this question for yourself, please.
So, questions remains, is there any technical (besides AC
mess) reason for keeping gcc 3.4.1 on DEVEL branch? [1]
wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[1] By asking the question I do not want to discuss AC
problems. I just want to know if gcc 3.4.1 is ready to use
(there is no todo in the spec, so I want just to be sure).
pgphkUmOyPEbL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
