On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:40:24PM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:28:42PM +0200, wrobell wrote:
> > if I remember well, there was a discussion about such
> > requirement in the context of zsh. the requirement is
> > unnecessary, because if you have no bash completion package
> > installed, then you will not use provided files. this way
> > the directory is not required and lack of the requirement
> > does not break anything.
> >
> > now, the requirement forces you to install the package, which is
> > not good idea - there are people who do not need bash, but use
> > the tools (now - tool - to be very specific)
>
> Well, that's a good point, but when I was adding this Requires field I
> was thinking of a situation where we would end up having
> /etc/bash_completion.d/subversion file but /etc/bash_completion.d
> directory not belonging to any of the packages. If such situation is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> acceptable, I see no reasons to keep this Reqires. As I wrote in
^^^^^^^^^^^^
> commitlog, I was not sure of this being correct.
It is acceptable, because files in the directory are
not used at all without bash completion package. For me
this little and _not_hurting_ disorder in filesystem is
a compromise between adding new very small subpackage and
unecessary requirement.
wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpOft6sOJGMu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
